Pets should be in the eye of the law more then just a person's property. I believe that family animal's should be considered when it comes to pain in suffering in civil cases. Right now the law considers pets property and you can not morn the loss of property you can just buy more property and it can be replaced. Well some pets a person grows to love like as if they were family. Can you just go to the mall and replace a son or daughter? Well you cant just replace a pet you have had for 10 of 15 years. It does not work that way, but the law thinks different and that needs to change. The law has to reflect the way that we as citizens feel and that means that if a person feels like they have lost a member of their family the law should make it so that they can be compensated for it up and above the cost that the person payed for the pet. I think this is just common sense and should have been implemented years ago, but the court is stuck in its own ways and refuses to change. We as citizens should lobbys the courts to change this injustice to our family animal members.
If you agree with my post leave a comment below.
* Dalton Thomas Sanderson The 1st*
1 comment:
solid article
Post a Comment